Built-up area now sets your section limit
CBSE links the number of sections a school may run to its certified built-up area, not its land area.
Align building certification and SARAS data before you apply.Governance, affiliation, academic and operational advisory for school promoters, trusts and leadership teams.
Schools are being held to a higher standard. We help them meet it.
Indian schools are operating through a period of rapid change. Affiliation norms are being revised, board examinations reformed, child-safety expectations enforced more strictly — and new obligations for protecting children’s data are on the horizon.
For promoters, trustees and principals, the question is no longer whether to invest in governance, but how to do it without burying educators in paperwork. That is the gap School GRC was built to close.
We bring the discipline of governance, risk and compliance — long established in regulated sectors — to K–12 education, paired with practical experience of setting up and running schools.
Regulators, parents and boards now expect evidence that a school is safe, compliant and well run — not just a set of certificates.
CBSE links the number of sections a school may run to its certified built-up area, not its land area.
Align building certification and SARAS data before you apply.The DPDP Rules require verifiable parental consent before a child’s data is processed, with most obligations phased in.
Review consent across admissions, ERP, apps and CCTV.CBSE withdrew a school’s affiliation after finding its safety committees existed only on paper.
Prove committees, CCTV and complaints work in practice.A mandatory main exam in February–March and an optional May exam for improvement in up to three subjects.
Redesign calendars, revision and results analysis.NEP 2020 and the National Curriculum Framework shift teaching and assessment toward competencies.
Make teacher capability a board-level priority.Sources: The Tribune on CBSE affiliation amendments; SCC Online on withdrawal of affiliation; CBSE notification on two Class 10 board examinations; Ministry of Electronics & IT, DPDP Rules; Ministry of Education, NEP 2020; NCERT, National Curriculum Framework for School Education. Requirements change — confirm current positions with the relevant authority.
Compliance that exists only on paper is not compliance.
We assess whether governance actually works, not just whether documents exist — using the School GRC Maturity Model.
Issues handled as they arise; knowledge sits with individuals.
Policies exist, but are not consistently followed.
Processes run routinely, with clear owners and evidence.
Leaders track indicators and review risks every term.
Continuous improvement; governance is a strategic strength.
Rate your school in each domain from 1 (reactive) to 5 (leading). Your profile and priority area update as you go.
Indicative only. A full review scores each domain against documented evidence.
Engage us for a single area or across the full lifecycle. Select any area for services, deliverables and the questions leaders should ask.
Every engagement runs through the same four phases — so you always know what happens next and what you will receive.
Site visit, document review, leadership interviews and maturity assessment.
Prioritise gaps, agree targets, assign owners and budget.
Policies, SOPs, filings, training and systems — alongside your team.
Termly reviews, audits and compliance-calendar tracking.
A focused assessment with a written gap report and maturity scorecard.
Hands-on delivery of a defined outcome, alongside your team.
A long-term advisor for leadership and the board.
Scenarios are illustrative and do not describe specific clients.
No. CBSE affiliation is our flagship service, but governance, academic, operational and safety advisory applies equally to state-board and other schools, and to trusts planning a new school.
Usually with a readiness review. It gives an evidence-based picture of where the school stands and which gaps to close first, before committing to a larger project.
It depends on scope and the school’s starting point. We agree timelines, milestones and owners during the Plan phase, and track them through to closure.
Our aim is the opposite: fewer, better processes with clear owners, and technology to keep records current, so educators can focus on teaching.
No. School Sinergy™ and the School GRC™ Platform help sustain improvements, but our advisory work stands on its own and works with your existing systems.
Book an initial consultation to discuss your school’s priorities and where we can help first.
For promoters and trusts planning a new school or a major expansion — grounded in demand, finance and regulation from day one.
Is there proven demand at our planned fee level?
What must be in place before the first admission?
End-to-end support for CBSE affiliation and state recognition — documented, inspection-ready and on schedule.
Does our certified built-up area support the sections we plan to run?
Would our records survive an inspection tomorrow?
Who owns each renewal and NOC — and when is it due?
An evidence-based check of land, built-up area, staffing, safety and records — delivered as a gap report, evidence checklist and prioritised closure plan.
We help schools design, strengthen and sustain high-quality teaching — and track whether it is working, term after term.
Is our Class 10 plan built for a February main exam and a May second exam?
Can we see learning gaps by grade and subject every term?
Do our teachers’ 50 CPD hours actually change classroom practice?
Second exam: improvement in up to three subjects (science, maths, social science, languages); the better score counts. Internal assessment is held once a year.
Processes, budgets and controls that make daily operations predictable and the school financially sustainable.
Do our SOPs reflect how the school actually runs?
Is our fee structure sustainable over five years?
Facility planning and safety assurance against statutory norms, child-safety expectations and real-world risks.
When was our campus last reviewed against safety norms?
Could we evidence our safety measures to an inspector today?
Structures, roles and HR practices that attract, develop and retain good teachers and leaders.
Is every role clearly defined, with one accountable owner?
Why do our good teachers leave — and do we know?
Our namesake practice: oversight, safeguarding and data protection that give boards confidence and regulators evidence.
Which risks could close our school — and who owns each one?
Do our safety committees work in practice, or only on paper?
Are we ready for DPDP parental-consent requirements?
Illustrative example, not client data.
For schools ready for the next stage — new campuses, digital capability or a reset in direction.
What would a second campus need that the first did not?
Are our systems ready to scale?